Peach Tree Times

Republican lawmakers are divided concerning their support for the utilization of earmarks and reforming anti-trust laws for Big Tech companies, according to a news report.

After Democrats reinstituted a revamped version of earmarks last month that includes new transparency measures, House Republicans lifted their decade-long internal ban on the practice of seeking earmarks.

In 2018, then-President Donald Trump had suggested that Congress should "think about going back to a form of earmarks." Republican leaders, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, defended the change by maintaining it would allow Republicans more direct access to project funding in their districts.

"There's a real concern about the [Biden] administration directing where the money goes," McCarthy said. "This doesn't add one more dollar. I think members here know what's most important about what's going on in their district, not [President] Biden. I think members want to have a say in their own district."

However, not all Republicans share this outlook. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) argued earmarks are “little more than legislative bribery.”

”Make no mistake, these will be used as currency for votes as Democratic leadership buys off moderates who do not support their party’s radical policy agenda,” Roy said, as reported by The Hill. "This chamber has already made it clear that it is no  longer the 'People’s House' in any true sense. Consolidating even more power in party leadership would be another institutional embarrassment on a list that’s already too long.”

This split among Republicans is also reflected in the party's internal disagreements regarding reforming anti-trust laws for Big Tech. Pro-Trump Republican groups such as The Center for American Restoration are pressuring Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and McCarthy to pursue legislative reform against Big Tech social media platforms including Facebook and Twitter.

"America's foundational values of diverse speech, market access and the free flow of information are imperiled by concentrated corporate power wielded at an unprecedented scale and in many cases, aided and abetted by federal policies. Inaction in this forum is no longer an acceptable response," the Center for American Restoration wrote in a letter to congressional leaders. "We look forward to reviewing the various bills and proposals that emerge as Congress refines its approach to this increasing and existential threat to our nation."

While Republicans have historically opposed intervening in the market, The Center for  American Restoration argues that the corporate power generated by tech companies represents a threat to free speech and democratic ideals that supersedes government overreach.

Complaints of conservative censorship among social medial sites grew increasingly prevalent among Trump and his allies nearing the end of his presidency. Trump himself was banned from Twitter following the Capitol riot on Jan. 6. The companies maintain the bans were a result of breaking policy rules and meant to keep users safe from hate speech and misinformation.

The Center for American Restoration is headed by former Trump administration official Russ Vought. The organization is joined by Jim DeMint's Conservative Partnership Institute, Mike Davis' Internet Accountability Project and L. Brent Bozell III's Media Research Center.