Peach Tree Times

A federal court has allowed a lawsuit challenging Georgia's congressional district map to proceed. The case, which questions the racial fairness of the district boundaries, will be heard in November. The decision by a three-judge panel from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia denies motions for summary judgment filed by the defendants.

Aunna Dennis, executive director of Common Cause Georgia, welcomed the court's ruling: “Having fair maps makes elected politicians responsive to the needs and wants of the people, by having elections where voters make the calls. We deserve better, and the law demands better, than the current voting maps that prevent Georgia’s communities on the margins of society from having a meaningful say in the halls of Congress."

Nichola Hines, president of the League of Women Voters of Georgia, emphasized their commitment to representation: “Congressional maps that limit representation of communities of color erode the very framework of our democracy. We are pleased that our case is moving forward, and the League will continue to fight for Georgia’s communities of color to have their voices heard."

Celina Stewart from the League of Women Voters of the US stated: “We know that unfair maps are just another barrier used to limit political power... We’re pleased that our case will continue as we seek to ensure voices... are not silenced through redistricting."

Jack Genberg from Southern Poverty Law Center commented on future proceedings: “We are pleased the court rejected Georgia’s attempt to avoid a trial and accountability.”

Cassandra Love from Dechert LLP expressed readiness for trial: “We look forward to continuing to work alongside Southern Poverty Law Center, Common Cause, and the League...”

The controversy stems from a congressional voting map passed in November 2021. Critics argue it disenfranchises Black voters by manipulating districts 6th, 13th, and 14th. A lawsuit was filed in January 2022 claiming these actions violate constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment.

The court previously held a hearing on May 30 regarding a motion for summary judgment related to this case.